Lindsay Lohan Sues E-Trade for Using the Name Lindsay

How self-absorbed do you have to be to file a lawsuit alleging that any commercial use of your first name, by anyone other than you, violates your civil rights?  Pretty damn self-absorbed, I’d say.

Lindsay Lohan, via her attorney, Stephanie Ovadia, filed suit in New York alleging that E-Trade violated her civil rights when they used the name “Lindsay” to refer to the milkaholic baby in an E-Trade commercial.

From a legal perspective, I understand that you can’t use a public figure’s likeness for commercial purposes.  I understand that even celebrities have a certain right to privacy.  But, I do not understand how Lindsay Lohan made the mind-boggling assumption that this E-Trade commercial was a parody of her life.

I saw the commercial several times and it never crossed my mind that they were referring to Lindsay Lohan.  I don’t know what’s worse – the fact that Lindsay Lohan is suing for $100 million, or that this attorney agreed to take the case.

According to the NY Post, Lindsay’s attorney actually said “Why didn’t they use the name Susan?”  Obviously they couldn’t use the name Susan because Susan Sarandon, Susan Lucci and Susan Boyle would have brought lawsuits.

Am I crazy, or is this money in the bank for Lindsay and her attorney?

Foreclosure or 6 Months Free Rent?

foreclosure avoidance

Citigroup recently announced a new policy that gives homeowners on the verge of foreclosure a new alternative. The foreclosure alternative requires that homeowners turn over the deed to their home and, in exchange, the ex-homeowner can stay in the home for 6 months with at least $1,000.00 relocation assistance and relocation counseling. You’ll still have to pay the utilities, but overall it’s not a bad deal if you’re faced with foreclosure.

Why would Citigroup do this? They save money when they avoid the foreclosure process. The foreclosure process involves paperwork, lawyers, courts, time and money. If a homeowner voluntarily hands over the keys and the deed, they can avoid much of that process. In addition, when Citigroup takes possession of the house, it’s much more likely that the home will be in good condition. Some people that are faced with foreclosure take that anger and frustration out on the house and trash the place before they leave. Not only is Citigroup trying to save time and money, but they are buying good will.

Check out the full article here.

Is Your Non-Compete Agreement Enforceable?

When you run a business, you want to protect that business.  Sometimes, you want to protect it so much that you might have your employees sign non-compete agreements (NCA).  A non-compete agreement essentially says that the employee cannot work, or perform certain functions, in a certain geographic area, for a specific period of time, when the employment at your company ends.

Think about that?  You are telling someone that they cannot earn a living doing whatever it is that they do.  That’s pretty bold.  That’s why courts view NCA’s very narrowly, meaning if there is any reason to invalidate the agreement, they won’t hesitate to do so.  In fact, some states presume that all non-compete agreements are invalid, including California (with some exceptions, of course).

There may be legitimate reasons for presenting your employee with an NCA.  If you hire an employee, train that employee, provide that employee with confidential information, or trade secrets, and give him leads that could not be developed from public sources, then it might be reasonable to ask the employee not to compete.  However, you still have to ensure that the agreement is narrowly drafted and complies with the legal requirements of your state.

The laws vary from state to state.  Before entering into any NCA, you need to check the laws in your state.  For the states that allow NCA’s, there are some general concepts that can help guide you when drafting an NCA.  NCA’s are enforceable if they are reasonable in time, geographic location, and scope of business.

When you restrict an employee’s right to work, it cannot be for an indefinite period of time.  Some states presume that 6 months is a reasonable time and over 2 years is presumed to be invalid.  If you are between 6 months and 2 years, you might have the burden of proving that the length of time is reasonable under the circumstances.

If your employee works, develops leads, and maintains all of his contacts within one city, it may not be reasonable to restrict him from working within the entire state.  The geographic restriction must relate to where the employee worked, not where your company conducts its business.

When drafting an effective NCA, you need to focus on what type of work the employee will do for you.  You cannot restrict the employee from performing work beyond the scope of his duties for you.  If your employee sells software that helps attorneys manage their cases, you may not be able to restrict that employee from going on to a new job selling software that helps accountants manage tax records.  You don’t have any business interest in that market, your employee did not perform those functions with you and you will not suffer any damages as a result of the employee’s new job.

A few other things you want to look at:

  • Who terminated the employment?  If you terminate an employee, a court might not be so open-minded with respect to the restrictions of an NCA.
  • Did you pay any compensation for the duration of the NCA?  If you pay an employee additional compensation for the NCA period, a court might view that favorably.
  • Is the information you deem to be confidential actually available from public sources?  Some business owners think that they have confidential information, when in reality that information is available from public sources.  If you claim that your employee is using your confidential information to gain business, be sure that it is actually confidential and not available from any other source.

Consider the information above when implementing an NCA, but first check your state laws regarding NCA’s.  The laws of your state might be very different from the general concepts listed above.